Filter by tags: International Atomic Energy Agency Ukraine Germany Poland Clear all tag filters
9 news articles found
The International Energy Agency (IEA) in its latest report, Electricity 2024, dedicates a significant amount of space to nuclear power – a departure from its previous studies which treated it as peripheral. In its press release on the new report, IEA says the increase in electricity generation from renewables and nuclear "appears to be pushing the power sector's emissions into structural decline". Over the next three years, low-emissions generation is set to rise at twice the annual growth rate between 2018 and 2023. Global emissions from electricity generation are expected to decrease by 2.4% in 2024, followed by smaller declines in 2025 and 2026.
- Source: NEI Magazine
- Date: Friday, 26 January 2024
- Original article: neimagazine.com/news/newsiea-acknowledges-significance-of-nuclear-energy-in-new-report-11463539
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi attended the World Economic Forum (WEF) Annual Meeting in Davos on 24 and 25 May. Nuclear provides the opportunity for a faster transition to a low-carbon energy future and supports the shift to a hydrogen economy, he told participants. In an opinion piece on the WEF website, Grossi said that nuclear is gaining increasing support in the battle against climate change, that reaching net-zero carbon emissions will require a doubling of nuclear capacity, and that technology such as small modular reactors (SMRs) and used fuel repositories are increasing nuclear accessibility and safety.
- Source: NEI Magazine
- Date: Friday, 27 May 2022
- Original article: neimagazine.com/news/newsiaeas-grossi-at-davos-discusses-nuclear-power-iran-and-ukraine-9729661
The urgent need to reduce emissions and slow global heating should involve the roll-out of more nuclear power stations, according to a new briefing released by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) on 11 August. In the run up to the COP 21 meeting in Glasgow, UNECE argues that nuclear power can help deliver on the Paris Agreement and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. UNECE, set up in 1947, is one of five regional commissions of the United Nations. Its main aim is to promote pan-European economic integration. UNECE includes 56 member states in Europe, North America, Central Asia and Western Asia.
- Source: NEI Magazine
- Date: Thursday, 19 August 2021
- Original article: neimagazine.com/news/newsunece-says-nuclear-power-essential-to-achieve-climate-goals-9007938
Nuclear power can be part of a broader portfolio alongside deploying other sustainable low- or zero-carbon technologies to decarbonise the global energy system and energy intensive industries, according to a new technology brief from the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). The publication highlights nuclear power as an important source of low-carbon energy that can contribute to attaining carbon neutrality and for policy-makers who wish to meet climate and sustainable development objectives using nuclear power should provide positive, long-term policy signals for new nuclear development.
- Source: World Nuclear News
- Date: Thursday, 12 August 2021
- Original article: world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Policies-must-allow-nuclear-to-play-its-vital-role
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said on 2 July that the recent detection of slightly elevated levels of radioisotopes in northern Europe is likely related to a nuclear reactor that is either operating or undergoing maintenance, when very low radioactive releases can occur. The geographical origin of the release has not yet been determined.
- Source: NEI Magazine
- Date: Wednesday, 08 July 2020
- Original article: neimagazine.com/news/newsiaea-reports-on-elevated-radiation-levels-in-northern-europe-8013677
The recorded air concentrations of the particles were very low and posed no risk to human health and the environment, the statement said.
However, the IAEA also said the geographical origin of the release has not yet been determined.
Last week, Estonia, Finland and Sweden reported levels of ruthenium-103, caesium-134 and caesium-137 isotopes in the air which were higher than usual.
The IAEA, in an effort to help identify the possible origin of the radioisotopes, contacted counterparts in Europe and asked for information about whether they were detected in their countries, and if any event there may have been associated with the atmospheric release.
- Source: Nucnet
- Date: Saturday, 04 July 2020
- Original article: nucnet.org/news/elevated-radioisotope-levels-in-nordic-region-likely-linked-to-nuclear-reactor-7-5-2020
The recent detection of slightly elevated levels of radioisotopes in northern Europe is likely related to a nuclear reactor that is either operating or undergoing maintenance, when very low radioactive releases can occur, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said yesterday. The geographical origin of the release has not yet been determined.
- Source: World Nuclear News
- Date: Saturday, 04 July 2020
- Original article: world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Source-of-low-level-European-release-remains-unsol
Poland is no newcomer to nuclear technology. The Polish National Centre for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) has operated a research reactor at Swierk, on the outskirts of the capital Warsaw, since the mid-1970s. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, the first plans to launch nuclear power were drawn up in 1956. Nuclear energy was seen as a tool that would enable reductions in internal coal consumption, on which the whole Polish energy sector was based. With nuclear, it would have been possible to save precious natural resources or to export them.
In 1971 the government made its first binding decision to build a nuclear plant. A year later it designated Zarnowiec, close to Poland’s Baltic coast in the northern province of Pomerania, as the site. After a decade of planning, construction of the four-unit Zarnowiec station began in 1982. The station was intended to have four Soviet-designed VVER-440 pressurised water reactors, which were to be manufactured by Skoda in Czechoslovakia. But public opposition to the project arose in 1986 in the aftermath of the Chernobyl disaster in neighbouring Soviet Ukraine and work on Zarnowiec was suspended in 1989. The project was formally scrapped in 1990.
Fast forward nearly two decades and Poland revived its nuclear ambitions in 2009 as part of a drive to find alternatives to ageing coal-fired electricity generation, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and boost energy supply security.
Poland, the largest economy among the EU’s eastern members, generated 80% of its electricity from coal in 2016, according to the International Energy Agency. The remaining 20% came from wind, hydro, other fossil fuels and biofuels. This reliance on coal is a cheap way to produce energy but provides an enormous headache for any government trying to maintain economic growth and meet ever-stricter EU greenhouse gas emission targets.
Nuclear, which provides reliable baseload supply and has overall lifecycle emissions that compare to wind power, seemed the logical choice. In 2014 the Polish ministry of economy adopted the Polish Nuclear Power Programme (PPEJ), which included the construction of up to 6 GW of capacity by 2035. According to the PPEJ, construction of a first unit should be completed by the end of 2024, and a second by 2029. The programme said a second nuclear station should be ready before 2035.
In 2010, PGE EJ1 (Polska Grupa Energetyczna Energia Jądrowa 1) was set up and charged with the planning and construction of the first nuclear station with a capacity of up to 3,750 MW. PGE EJ1’s job would include site search, environmental impact assessment, various licensing procedures, construction and subsequent operation. The company is 70% owned by Polish state-controlled utility PGE. The remaining 30% share is equally spread between three state-run companies, Enea, KGHM Polska Miedz and Tauron Polska Energia.
Under the proposed schedule in the PPEJ, site selection and a tender process should have been concluded by the end of 2016 and licensing by the end of 2018. In reality, development of the nuclear programme has not gone to schedule and these deadlines have become increasingly unrealistic.
Delays...and some progress
According to Professor Grzegorz Wrochna of the NCBJ one of the problems was that the PPEJ had assumed the project would take 10 years from the investment decision to operation of the first reactor. This schedule was based on International Atomic Energy Agency documents, which were in turn based on the experience of other nuclear countries. However, it soon became clear that Poland would need 16 years to get its nuclear programme operational because existing Polish laws did not allow many of the regulatory processes to run in parallel to each other.
Delays also arose when, in December 2014, PGE EJ1 cancelled a contract with Woorley Parsons over slow progress on site characterisation and licensing work. PGE EJ1 awarded the contract to Woorley Parsons in 2013 with 2016 set as a deadline. PGE EJ1 had to take over the contractor’s tasks.
However, there has been progress. In April 2017, PGE EJ1 began environmental and site selection surveys at two locations: Lubiatowo-Kopalino in the municipality of Choczewo and Żarnowiec in the municipality of Krokowa, both in northern Pomerania, west of the city of Gdansk. The studies aim to determine the potential impact of the project on both the environment and local residents. This work is expected to be completed by 2020.
In October 2015 general elections in Poland brought the conservative Law and Justice party to power and responsibility for the nascent nuclear programme was transferred to a newly formed ministry of energy. The new energy minister Krzysztof Tchorzewski confirmed work on the programme would continue, but that it needed to be reviewed. The review was expected to be completed by mid-2017, but that deadline was later extended to the end of 2017 and was never met.
There have been few official updates from PGE EJ1 or the energy ministry on the status of the nuclear programme.
In January 2017, however, Mr Tchorzewski said he had received a mandate from the cabinet to present a new financing model for the project. A few months later he said the government had abandoned plans to finance the nuclear project by way of contracts for difference – similar to those set up for the Hinkley Point C nuclear station under construction in England – because it was too costly for consumers. He said the government would like to find funding on a commercial basis, without state guarantees on loans or electricity prices.
PGE EJ1 has stopped short of confirming a financing scheme and has said all options remain on the drawing board. Recently, the Polish media has speculated about possible government plans to involve state-owned energy companies in the nuclear project. Officials from Orlen, Poland’s largest oil refiner and petrol retailer, recently hinted to journalists that the company would be interested in cooperating with PGE EJ1 on the nuclear project.
In another twist, in September 2017, Jozef Sobolewski, director of the Polish ministry of energy’s nuclear energy department, told a parliamentary committee on nuclear energy that the government was considering using “domestic” financing for construction of the first station. He said the government did not want to have its decision about the project dominated by financial markets. “It's not a financial project, it’s an energy project”, he said.
Mr Sobolewski estimated the cost of building 1 GW of nuclear capacity at €2.8bn to €3.25bn, based on the assumption that a 3-GW station would be built.
Rafał Zasun, an editor at the specialised energy portal Wysokie Napiecie, told NucNet that the main reason for delaying the final decision on the nuclear programme is the government’s inability to agree on its financing. “The idea of building a nuclear power station has strong opponents in government and in state-owned energy companies”, he said.
According to Aleksandra Gawlikowska-Fyk, head of the international economic relations and energy policy programme at the Polish Institute of International Affairs, the energy ministry is in the process of revising the national energy policy framework for the first time since 2009. Because there are many overlapping aspects, the review impacts the nuclear programme’s schedule, she said.
A decision is now expected by mid-2018, according to the latest reports.
Why does Poland need nuclear?
Poland needs nuclear because of its low carbon footprint and as a way to decrease the country’s carbon emissions, said energy minister Krzysztof Tchorzewski. He told a recent conference that Poland’s ongoing large-scale investment in three new coal-fired power plants may be the country’s last fossil fuel venture, indicating a possible energy shift in the country’s revived plans to embrace nuclear power.
There are other factors that point to the need for nuclear. Poland signed up to the EU’s target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 20% from 1990 levels by 2020. It has had one of the fastest growing economies in the EU for the past decade and electricity demand is expected to grow by about 36% by 2030.
“Poland needs to decrease emissions and nuclear offers that”, Ms Gawlikowska-Fyk said. “This argument has been used for years”.
“It is no secret that the European Commission expects a vision of the future energy mix in the country and nuclear is showcased by Poland as a way to reduce emissions”, she said.
According to Ms Gawlikowska-Fyk, smog is “the elephant in the room” and a significant influence on Polish public opinion. A report by the World Health Organisation says that out of the 50 European cities most affected by smog, 33 are in Poland. The WHO estimates that around 50,000 Poles die every year due to illness caused by air pollution.
But the prominence of coal mining and coal-related industries in Poland presents challenges to every government when it comes to energy sector reforms. Poland is the second largest coal mining country in Europe, second to Germany, and the coal industry employs 100,000 people.
However, experts have warned for years that the cheapest sources of coal in the Silesian Basin are nearly depleted and that the country’s mining sector will have to prepare for higher costs in the future.
Meanwhile, work continues on the choice of a technology for the project. The PPEJ did not shortlist a technology; the only requirement is for reactors to be of the Generation III/III+ design because of their improved safety and 60-year design lifespan. The number of units that will be built and their site configuration will depend on the technology choice.
In December 2015 PGE EJ1 said five companies had expressed an interest in supplying reactor technology. They were GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas, Korea Electric Power Corporation, SNC-Lavalin Nuclear Inc, Westinghouse Electric Company and Areva. PGE EJ1 said at the time that preliminary discussions had been held with all five.
A public tender for the construction of the first nuclear power station was scheduled to be announced in late 2017 or early 2018, but this now seems unlikely.
- Source: Nucnet
- Date: Thursday, 22 March 2018
- Original article: nucnet.org/news/special-report-poland-faces-delays-and-decisions-as-it-makes-ambitious-plans-to-go-nuclear
Russian state nuclear corporation Rosatom in 2016 will contribute RUB24.6m ($300,000) from its state budget allocation to the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA's) International Project on Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles (INPRO project), according to a Russian government directive published on the official legal information portal. The directive says Rosatom and the Russian Foreign Ministry will monitor the use of the Russian contribution.
- Source: NEI Magazine
- Date: Thursday, 28 January 2016
- Original article: neimagazine.com/news/newsrussia-contributes-to-iaea-inpro-project-4795612